PitchBook Alternatives for Digital Infrastructure M&A
Compare PitchBook, Capital IQ Pro, Grata and Sourcescrub for digital infrastructure M&A research, with a practical coverage and pricing checklist.
PitchBook alternatives for digital infrastructure M&A depend on the research task. Capital IQ Pro combines company financials and transaction data; Grata and Sourcescrub focus on private-company discovery. None can be assumed to cover a particular tower, fiber or data-center target list without a sample test in the relevant market.
PitchBook itself remains a candidate: its current platform page describes company, deal, investor and fund research, screening and benchmarking. This comparison is a way to choose what to trial, not a ranking of database accuracy or regional coverage. Product descriptions below are provider-stated; Amafi has not tested the datasets. Evidence checked 7 October 2026.
Compare by job, not headline database size
| Research job | Product to evaluate | What the official source describes | What to verify in a trial |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private-market deal and fund context | PitchBook | Company, deal, investor and fund profiles, screening and research | Relevant entities, record dates and usable deal details |
| Financials and transaction comparisons | Capital IQ Pro | Public and private company data, transaction intelligence and modelling links | Field provenance, comparable set and licence rights |
| Search for niche private operators | Grata | Contextual private-company search, similar-company discovery and market mapping | Relevant operators, false positives and geography |
| Build lists from trade shows and other sources | Sourcescrub | Source-linked company discovery and origination workflows | Source quality, duplicates and current product access |
PitchBook’s deal-sourcing page describes private-market transactions, fund manager activity and industry trends. S&P’s Capital IQ Pro page describes private-company and transaction datasets as well as public-market analysis. These sources do not support a blanket claim that either product covers only funded businesses.
Grata’s sourcing page describes contextual search and similar-company discovery. Sourcescrub’s product site emphasizes company records linked to curated source lists. These are different discovery methods, but neither public page proves that a given fiber operator, tower portfolio or APAC target is present. The distinction should be checked with actual examples.
Treat Grata and Sourcescrub as related options
Datasite announced its acquisition of Sourcescrub in August 2025 and said Sourcescrub’s data and capabilities would be integrated into Grata. Both product sites remained available when this article was reviewed. A buyer should ask which dataset, interface and contract is being offered now; do not assume two independent subscriptions or a completed integration.
A digital infrastructure coverage test
Before requesting a quote, build a short list of known operators across your actual segments and jurisdictions. Include a mix of data centers, fiber networks and tower businesses, plus any asset-owning entities whose corporate names differ from their trading names. Then ask each provider to demonstrate:
- Entity match: Can the platform distinguish the operating company, asset vehicle, parent and investor?
- Evidence date: When were ownership, financial and transaction fields last checked, and what is the underlying source?
- Search recall: Which known operators appear, and which relevant operators are missed?
- Workflow rights: Can the team export, share or connect the results under the proposed licence?
- Full cost: What is quoted for required seats, datasets, exports, renewal and implementation?
Count missing records and wrong matches alongside successful hits. A vendor’s total company count does not answer a corridor-specific sourcing question. For the wider software stack, see the PE deal-sourcing guide and Amafi’s tools methodology.
Pricing and fit
The current public pages for PitchBook, Capital IQ Pro, Grata and Sourcescrub route prospective buyers through sales or demo paths. They do not establish a comparable standard per-seat price for this use case.
Use the same sample entities and contract assumptions for each quote. If the work is mainly financial comparisons, start with PitchBook and Capital IQ Pro. If the work is finding lesser-known private operators, include Grata and Sourcescrub in the discovery test, while confirming their present product relationship. For a broader selection framework, browse Amafi’s source-dated tool profiles.
Frequently asked questions
Which PitchBook alternative is useful for digital infrastructure M&A?
Capital IQ Pro is a candidate for company financials and transaction comparisons; Grata and Sourcescrub are candidates for private-company discovery. Test each against named tower, fiber and data-center operators in your target markets. Public product pages cannot establish the best coverage for a specific mandate.
Do Grata and Sourcescrub still compete independently?
Datasite acquired Sourcescrub and announced that its data and capabilities would be integrated into Grata. Both product sites were accessible on 7 October 2026. Ask which datasets and workflows are currently sold separately before treating them as independent procurement choices.
What does PitchBook cost?
PitchBook’s public pages direct prospective buyers to a trial or sales conversation without a standard per-seat price. Request a written quote for the users, datasets, exports and contract term your team needs.
